Difference between revisions of "Evaluation of User Interface and Workflow Design of a Bedside Nursing Clinical Decision Support System"
Vishaghera (Talk | contribs) (→References) |
Vishaghera (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
===Objectives=== | ===Objectives=== | ||
The authors developed a CDSS for the CHRISTUS St. Michael health system (a 350 bed acute care hospital)with a goal to reduce | The authors developed a CDSS for the CHRISTUS St. Michael health system (a 350 bed acute care hospital)with a goal to reduce | ||
| − | preventable failure to rescue (FTR) cases in the hospital.The FTR is a leading patient safety indicator with the highest incident rates among all indicators according to a recent largescale study | + | preventable failure to rescue (FTR) cases in the hospital.The FTR is a leading patient safety indicator with the highest incident rates among all indicators according to a recent largescale study |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
===Methods=== | ===Methods=== | ||
Revision as of 21:52, 11 February 2015
Contents
Background
Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are important tools to improve health care outcomes and reduce preventable medical adverse events.However, CDSS implementations that do not fit local practices and are not tailored to the users' requirements and workflows often have issues with usability, having a negative impact on their effectiveness and on clinical outcomes. Hence usability design and validation in the clinical settings in which the CDSS would be used is a critical aspect of a successful CDSS implementation.
Objectives
The authors developed a CDSS for the CHRISTUS St. Michael health system (a 350 bed acute care hospital)with a goal to reduce preventable failure to rescue (FTR) cases in the hospital.The FTR is a leading patient safety indicator with the highest incident rates among all indicators according to a recent largescale study
