Difference between revisions of "Healthcare quality process measures"

From Clinfowiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Standardization of Process Measures)
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
Possible reasons why the Accordance of guideline was not 100% in the above example include: tetatus vaccination within 10 years, allergy to vaccination, or patient refusal.
 
Possible reasons why the Accordance of guideline was not 100% in the above example include: tetatus vaccination within 10 years, allergy to vaccination, or patient refusal.
 
  
 
== '''Advantages''' ==
 
== '''Advantages''' ==

Revision as of 17:47, 27 July 2013

Healthcare quality process measures are often used to recommend guidelines for clinical practice based on scientific evidence or consensus. Quality measures are defined as metrics, indicators, or ratings which provide information in regards to the quality of care that patients are receiving in a particular setting. A process measure is a type of quality measure that assess a health service provided to or on behalf of a patient.

Standardization of Process Measures

Evidence based research is used to create guidelines for healthcare. Once guidelines are developed, standardization of process measures can be achieved. The following formula is one way to explain this:

      Number of Patients Who Receive Care/Number of Patients Eligible to Receive Care=y
      y multiplied by 100=Percentage of Patients Who are in Accordance with the Guideline 

This would allow a quality assessment comparison of what was actually done to what should have been done. Once the results of process measures have been determined, the reasons why that measure was performed or not performed can be evaluated further. Process measures can be tracked as part of the electronic health record. Thus making results and alerts easily accessible to providers.

An applicable example would be an emergency room guideline that requires a tetanus vaccine for patients seen that have been injured by a nail or screw. If in the month of June, 10 patients visited the emergency room after being hurt by a nail and 7 received the vaccine, then the percentage of patients in accordance with the guideline would be 70%. This information should be kept in the electronic health record (EHR). If the patient is seen again within 10 years, he/she should not be given the vaccine. However, if the patient is seen again after 10 years, regardless of the reason, an alert in the EHR should prompt the provider to administer the vaccine.

Possible reasons why the Accordance of guideline was not 100% in the above example include: tetatus vaccination within 10 years, allergy to vaccination, or patient refusal.

Advantages

  1. Can be used to provide feedback for quality improvement initiatives. It also provides information that is actionable, what is being done well or what needs improvement. It gives the ability to accurately reflect the care that clinicians are providing.
  2. Minimal risk adjustment for patient illnesses. A process measure requires defining a population that is eligible to receive the process. For example, patient population to receive antihistamine upon admittance to ER for allergic reaction.
  3. Data collection can be done when clinical process is occurring. This eliminates the need for additional tracking of patients for data collection.

Disadvantages

1. May be difficult to specify population eligible for a process. There may be many exclusions ??? indications. 2. Not as valued to patients and non-clinicians. Patients believe providers responsibility to perform appropriate care and are only concerned about outcome.


Relationship between Process Measures and Outcome Measures

An outcome measure is the patient's health status as a result of receiving medical care. The outcome measure is important to determine how the health care treatment received influenced the desired result. Mortality rate is an outcome measure. The reason for mortality in a patient usually relies on complex risk adjustment. Outcome measures are often more difficult than process measures to quantify the quality of care due to the amount of multiple factors that may be involved. Outcome measure calculations are usually based on specific groups or populations.

For example, if a process measure answers the question of did the patient receive the right care, an outcome measure answers the question of did the patient respond favorably to the treatment. Therefore, the information obtained from both process measures and outcome measures collectively gives a comprehensive assessment of healthcare quality.

  1. Process measures assess weather specific healthcare services are provided to an individual who needs them based on their conditions and place of treatment
  2. Outcome measures assess how patients actually fair during and after their treatment.
  3. Outcome measures attempt to gauge the comprehensive result of multiple healthcare services (or processes) provided to an individual.

Donabedian

?? Proposed that we measure quality of healthcare by observing its structure, process, outcomes…