Difference between revisions of "Key capabilities of an electronic health record system"

From Clinfowiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "== First Review == This is a review of the report to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, ''Key capabilities of an electronic health record system''. <ref name="...")
 
(Discussion)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
Identification of core EHR functions was driven by the need to fulfill the following key criteria:  improve patient safety; support effective care delivery; manage chronic illness; improve process efficiency; and determine implementation feasibility.   
 
Identification of core EHR functions was driven by the need to fulfill the following key criteria:  improve patient safety; support effective care delivery; manage chronic illness; improve process efficiency; and determine implementation feasibility.   
  
The eight core functions are as follows:
+
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|+ Summary of Core EHR Functions adapted from Tang (2003).
 +
|-
 +
! Core Function
 +
! Beneficial Examples
 +
|-
 +
| Health information and data
 +
| Display of patient demographics, medical history, current medications, allergies, problem list, diagnoses, and care narratives for provision of efficient care delivery
 +
|-
 +
| Results management
 +
| Display of previous laboratory test results, radiology reports accessible by the provider at the point of care
 +
|-
 +
| Order entry/management
 +
| Computerized ordering for medication, laboratory tests, and procedures enables consistency and completion of care delivery, reduction in duplicative orders, reduced lag time in execution and improved communications between ancillary service providers 
 +
|-
 +
| Decision support
 +
| Knowledge-based guidance to deliver enhanced clinical performance.  Examples include reduction in adverse events, improved drug selection and dosing, increased preventive interventions, and computer-assisted diagnosis and treatment management
 +
|-
 +
| Electronic communication and connectivity
 +
| Secure, effective exchange of information among care team members and other care partners (e.g., laboratory, pharmacy) allows for continuity and completeness of care (especially for chronic conditions), improves patient safety and quality of care and enables public health surveillance 
 +
|-
 +
| Patient support
 +
| Provision of patient education and facilitation of home monitoring by patients
 +
|-
 +
| Administrative processes
 +
| Scheduling; billing & claims processing; eligibility, referrals and authorizations management can all serve to eliminate delays, confusion and miscommunication in care administration processes
 +
|-
 +
| Reporting & population health management
 +
| Facilitation and automation of reporting key internal quality indicators as well as mandated reporting requirements increases the safety and quality of care and for patients and populations - automation of these reporting tasks can increase data accuracy and reduce data collection burdens
 +
|}
  
* Health information and data
 
* Results management
 
* Order entry/management
 
* Decision support
 
* Electronic communication and connectivity
 
* Patient support (e.g., education, preventive care)
 
* Administrative processes (e.g., scheduling, claims processing)
 
* Reporting & population health management
 
 
 
=== Conclusion ===
 
=== Conclusion ===
  

Revision as of 19:33, 28 October 2015

First Review

This is a review of the report to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Key capabilities of an electronic health record system. [1]

Background and Purpose

In this report to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Institute of Medicine clarifies the key capabilities of an Electronic Health Record (EHR) system. A functional model of these capabilities are necessary for achievement of nationwide strategies to promote widespread adoption of EHR systems and interoperability across multiple organizations and providers. A common set of functional capabilities informs software development and assists decision making during acquisition of an EHR.

Discussion

Identification of core EHR functions was driven by the need to fulfill the following key criteria: improve patient safety; support effective care delivery; manage chronic illness; improve process efficiency; and determine implementation feasibility.

Summary of Core EHR Functions adapted from Tang (2003).
Core Function Beneficial Examples
Health information and data Display of patient demographics, medical history, current medications, allergies, problem list, diagnoses, and care narratives for provision of efficient care delivery
Results management Display of previous laboratory test results, radiology reports accessible by the provider at the point of care
Order entry/management Computerized ordering for medication, laboratory tests, and procedures enables consistency and completion of care delivery, reduction in duplicative orders, reduced lag time in execution and improved communications between ancillary service providers
Decision support Knowledge-based guidance to deliver enhanced clinical performance. Examples include reduction in adverse events, improved drug selection and dosing, increased preventive interventions, and computer-assisted diagnosis and treatment management
Electronic communication and connectivity Secure, effective exchange of information among care team members and other care partners (e.g., laboratory, pharmacy) allows for continuity and completeness of care (especially for chronic conditions), improves patient safety and quality of care and enables public health surveillance
Patient support Provision of patient education and facilitation of home monitoring by patients
Administrative processes Scheduling; billing & claims processing; eligibility, referrals and authorizations management can all serve to eliminate delays, confusion and miscommunication in care administration processes
Reporting & population health management Facilitation and automation of reporting key internal quality indicators as well as mandated reporting requirements increases the safety and quality of care and for patients and populations - automation of these reporting tasks can increase data accuracy and reduce data collection burdens

Conclusion

This set of core functions should assist providers and vendors in efforts to implement EHR systems. Addressing each of the functional areas and the underlying criteria should help to build a comprehensive foundation for clinical information systems allowing providers to improve delivery of care and enable patients to become active participants in their care plans.

Comments

Providers with a safety-net role face multiple barriers to EHR adoption such as lack of funding and leadership support as well as policy constraints. This report is useful for building a case for the need for EHR implementation and achieving leadership buy-in.

Second Review

Add next review here.

References

  1. <Tang, P. C. (2003). Key capabilities of an electronic health record system. Institute of Medicine: Committee on Data Standards for Patient Safety• Board on Health Care Services, Washington, DC.