Difference between revisions of "You and me and the computer makes three: variations in exam room use of the electronic health record"
(Created page with "== Background == This article discusses the challenges of bringing an EHR into the workflow of a clinical setting without too much disruption. Through interviews and observat...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Background == | == Background == | ||
| − | This article discusses the challenges of bringing an EHR into the workflow of a clinical setting without too much disruption. Through interviews and observation, the researchers looked at 20 outpatient clinicians and found many differences in the barriers faced with | + | This article discusses the challenges of bringing an EHR into the workflow of a clinical setting without too much disruption. Through interviews and observation, the researchers looked at 20 outpatient clinicians and found many differences in the barriers faced with EHR implementation in the exam rooms and how that influences workflow and the relationship between provider and patient. |
== Methods == | == Methods == | ||
| − | The researchers conducted interviews with various clinicians to understand the ways | + | The researchers conducted interviews with various clinicians to understand the ways EHR use differed among the providers and the clinics. Field observations also occurred to record the patient’s clinical encounter. The data collected was organized into four categories: barriers, facilities, deviations, and routine variations. |
== Results == | == Results == | ||
| − | Although there were a great deal of differences in how the | + | Although there were a great deal of differences in how the EHR was used throughout the clinic encounter, some of barriers encountered included: 1)the amount of time spent on reviewing or documenting in the EHR depended on how familiar the clinician was with the patient or whether it was a new patient; 2)communication with other clinicians for consults and care coordination became a barrier, since it required using the EHR rather than face to face communication; 3)the provider to patient interaction was affected by the extra glances to document in the EHR; 4)the time it took to complete a note also affected the workflow of clinicians. |
== Conclusion == | == Conclusion == | ||
| − | The researchers concluded that because of the great variations in | + | The researchers concluded that because of the great variations in EHR use, implementation needs to accommodate for this variation by designing the EHR to fit the clinician’s nees. |
== Comments == | == Comments == | ||
Revision as of 00:34, 20 October 2015
Contents
Background
This article discusses the challenges of bringing an EHR into the workflow of a clinical setting without too much disruption. Through interviews and observation, the researchers looked at 20 outpatient clinicians and found many differences in the barriers faced with EHR implementation in the exam rooms and how that influences workflow and the relationship between provider and patient.
Methods
The researchers conducted interviews with various clinicians to understand the ways EHR use differed among the providers and the clinics. Field observations also occurred to record the patient’s clinical encounter. The data collected was organized into four categories: barriers, facilities, deviations, and routine variations.
Results
Although there were a great deal of differences in how the EHR was used throughout the clinic encounter, some of barriers encountered included: 1)the amount of time spent on reviewing or documenting in the EHR depended on how familiar the clinician was with the patient or whether it was a new patient; 2)communication with other clinicians for consults and care coordination became a barrier, since it required using the EHR rather than face to face communication; 3)the provider to patient interaction was affected by the extra glances to document in the EHR; 4)the time it took to complete a note also affected the workflow of clinicians.
Conclusion
The researchers concluded that because of the great variations in EHR use, implementation needs to accommodate for this variation by designing the EHR to fit the clinician’s nees.
