Difference between revisions of "Gender differences in diabetes self-management: a mixed-methods analysis of a mobile health intervention for inner-city Latino patients"

From Clinfowiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "The following is a review of Burner et al. on the observed gender differences in diabetes self-management through the utilization of an mHealth intervention. <ref name="Burner...")
 
(Comments)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
== Introduction ==
 
== Introduction ==
  
Mobile Health or [[MHealth]] represents an innovative path to help self-manage patients suffering from chronic diseases. However, although it is a promising market, how can a physician asses and be sure on which of the current applications in the digital market is the most optimal to provide to his/her patient with the tools required to improve his quality of life. This paper considers different factors crucial in the election of an application to help manage patients chronic status. The main objective from the study is to provide those applications which provide their information to patients from evidence-based programs, consistent with behavioral theory, as well as a patient-centered approach for matching apps to patients' individual needs.  
+
[[MHealth]] technology is an emerging field that uses devices that many patients already own and use to improve health.  This promising tools have diverse features such as improving the self-management of patients suffering from chronic diseases. Diabetes has been a notorious and prominent public health problem affecting the diverse american population, especially African Americans and Hispanics. Although it has become an acclaimed tool for the implementation of follow-up treatments and self-management in patients, few is known about the factors which contribute to it's utilization such as Socio-economic status (SES). Berner et al. explore the impact of diabetes management among low-income Latino patients through the Trial to Examine Text Message for Emergency Department Patients with Diabetes (TExT-MED) a text message-based program designed to improve disease knowledge, self-efficacy, and glycemic control among low-income Latinos.
  
 
== Methods ==
 
== Methods ==
  
A three-step framework was established for the conduction of the study:
+
23 Diabetic patients recruited for the study were selected from the emergency department at Los Angeles County Hospital at the University of Southern California; largest public safety-net hospital in Los Angeles County serving a predominantly Latino population.
  
The first step was the Selection or Identification which elected the most popular highest quality apps in which their content was based on evidence-based information. Apps were selected based on the following inclusion criteria:(1) consistent with the 29 app topics, (2) less than AUD $5, and (3) written in English.
+
A three-phase framework was established for the conduction of the study:
  
Second, the categorization based on topics and core intervention strategies. Core intervention strategies of each app were identified by using the Behaviour Theory Content Survey (BTS).
+
* Phase I (Completed, May 2011) - Tested feasibility and acceptability among the target population.  
 +
- 1-month bilingual (English and Spanish) diabetes curriculum of text messages
 +
- Three messages/day in preferred language: (1) educational and motivational messages (67%), (2) trivia questions (12%), (3) healthy-behavior challenge (14%)
  
Third, a patient centered-approach was taken into consideration to match the patients needs based on problem etiology and patient motivation.
+
* Phase II (The study) -  Qualitative analysis of the program.
 +
- Assembled two focus groups of 90-min duration—one in English and one in Spanish from the pool of Phase I participants. Moderator delivered consistent probes between groups.
 +
- Including:  (1) how they sought health information, (2) how trustworthy and valid they found the information from TExT-MED, (3) whether they sought further information after receiving a text message, and (4) with whom they shared the TExT-MED information.
 +
- Conversations were recorded and transcribed for further analysis.
 +
 
 +
* Phase III (Ongoing) - Randomized and Controlled trials.
  
 
== Results ==   
 
== Results ==   
  
App Identification: From the top 200 free and grossing apps only 4 were recovered. Two were exercise apps and two were diet-focused apps; Interestingly, none of the results were specific to diabetes.  
+
* Phase I - 20 patients were able to follow-up for data collection at trial completion.  
 +
- Men’s average scores on the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire decreased slightly (8.4 to 6.8), while women’s knowledge increased (8.5 to 10.5).  
  
App Categorization: Five categories were yielded from the vast list of apps including Healthy eating, Physical activity, Self-monitoring, Problem solving, and Healthy coping. With Healthy eating and Physical activity been the categories with the most apps. Scores from the BTS were significantly low, since the max possible score was a 100 been 24.4 the mean total score.  
+
- Self-efficacy measured by the Diabetes Empowerment Scale improved for men, with a minimal change for women (30 to 33.4 for men and 34.2 to 34.0 for women).  
  
App Patient Needs: The third step consisted on basically allocating the patient into the different categories established by step two; There was no single common patient-need specific to a single category the results indicated that indeed patient needs couldn't be associated to a category.  
+
- Checking food labels did not change for men or women, while percent of patients who ate a fruit or vegetable each day improved for men (from 43% to 82%) but did not change for women.
 +
 
 +
- Medication adherence and exercise behaviors improved for both gender groups.
 +
 
 +
- Women increased the number of times they checked their blood sugar and feet, while men exhibited no change in blood sugar checks and decreased the number of times they checked their feet.
 +
 
 +
* Phase II - 8 patients returned for focus groups
 +
 
 +
From the qualitative analysis three major factors were identified as prominent differences between genders:
 +
 
 +
(1) Dietary self-efficacy
 +
- Male subjects felt that their knowledge on diet and ability to prepare their own meals, affected their self-management of diabetes.
 +
 
 +
(2) Health information sources
 +
- Males: Mainly obtained their knowledge either from physicians or media (TV, radio, internet)
 +
- Females: Mainly obtained their knowledge from family or fiends advises
 +
 
 +
(3) Desired content of further educational materials
 +
- Males: Erectile dysfunction was a prominent topic among all of them
 +
- Females: Prevention of yeast infection and menopause
  
 
== Conclusion ==
 
== Conclusion ==
  
Most of the applications provided in their content general information and assistance to their users, but were limited in assessment, feedback, or tailored assistance. Results also show that apps incorporated some degree of interaction with the users as an intervention strategy, but the emotional and cognitive areas were very underdeveloped or simply not present, an aspect believed to be crucial for the motivation of the use of technology by men.  
+
Analysis through the TExT-MED shows that low-income Latino patients will accept text messages as a behavioral intervention. This mHealth intervention acts as a behavioral trigger rather than an education platform. Although the sample size in this study is low, we shouldn't consider it a failure. The work conducted in the study by Burner et al. shows that indeed perzonalization would be a task required in mHealth if further improvement of self-management of diabetes and chronic diseases wants to observed.
Although the study suggest that the chronic treatment of a patient would improve significantly by customizing the application to the patients-needs it wouldn't be feasible for the app developer to materialize a software so exclusive since it would also affect the range in the market for him. Also, it’s incredible the degree of evolution in applications in categories such as social media, news, games, business or education while sadly having no substantial development in the category of Health applications, specifically for the improvement of chronic health illnesses. Perhaps, it is indeed an unexplored new market with many flaws, but it is also a digital realm which potentially can allow us to monitor and improve a patient’s life expectancy. Focusing and shifting the interest of developers into applications truly functional with an emotional component and of friendly-use for users will play a crucial role in the health service delivered to our patients in a not so distant future.  
+
 
 +
== Comments ==
 +
Proper education and management of chronic diseases such as diabetes is important to improve quality of life. The search for innovative, accessible and cost effective tools is essential for patients of all ethnic groups. mHealth is a technology that will benefit many patients.
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==

Latest revision as of 22:14, 8 October 2015

The following is a review of Burner et al. on the observed gender differences in diabetes self-management through the utilization of an mHealth intervention. [1]

Introduction

MHealth technology is an emerging field that uses devices that many patients already own and use to improve health. This promising tools have diverse features such as improving the self-management of patients suffering from chronic diseases. Diabetes has been a notorious and prominent public health problem affecting the diverse american population, especially African Americans and Hispanics. Although it has become an acclaimed tool for the implementation of follow-up treatments and self-management in patients, few is known about the factors which contribute to it's utilization such as Socio-economic status (SES). Berner et al. explore the impact of diabetes management among low-income Latino patients through the Trial to Examine Text Message for Emergency Department Patients with Diabetes (TExT-MED) a text message-based program designed to improve disease knowledge, self-efficacy, and glycemic control among low-income Latinos.

Methods

23 Diabetic patients recruited for the study were selected from the emergency department at Los Angeles County Hospital at the University of Southern California; largest public safety-net hospital in Los Angeles County serving a predominantly Latino population.

A three-phase framework was established for the conduction of the study:

  • Phase I (Completed, May 2011) - Tested feasibility and acceptability among the target population.

- 1-month bilingual (English and Spanish) diabetes curriculum of text messages - Three messages/day in preferred language: (1) educational and motivational messages (67%), (2) trivia questions (12%), (3) healthy-behavior challenge (14%)

  • Phase II (The study) - Qualitative analysis of the program.

- Assembled two focus groups of 90-min duration—one in English and one in Spanish from the pool of Phase I participants. Moderator delivered consistent probes between groups. - Including: (1) how they sought health information, (2) how trustworthy and valid they found the information from TExT-MED, (3) whether they sought further information after receiving a text message, and (4) with whom they shared the TExT-MED information. - Conversations were recorded and transcribed for further analysis.

  • Phase III (Ongoing) - Randomized and Controlled trials.

Results

  • Phase I - 20 patients were able to follow-up for data collection at trial completion.

- Men’s average scores on the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire decreased slightly (8.4 to 6.8), while women’s knowledge increased (8.5 to 10.5).

- Self-efficacy measured by the Diabetes Empowerment Scale improved for men, with a minimal change for women (30 to 33.4 for men and 34.2 to 34.0 for women).

- Checking food labels did not change for men or women, while percent of patients who ate a fruit or vegetable each day improved for men (from 43% to 82%) but did not change for women.

- Medication adherence and exercise behaviors improved for both gender groups.

- Women increased the number of times they checked their blood sugar and feet, while men exhibited no change in blood sugar checks and decreased the number of times they checked their feet.

  • Phase II - 8 patients returned for focus groups

From the qualitative analysis three major factors were identified as prominent differences between genders:

(1) Dietary self-efficacy - Male subjects felt that their knowledge on diet and ability to prepare their own meals, affected their self-management of diabetes.

(2) Health information sources - Males: Mainly obtained their knowledge either from physicians or media (TV, radio, internet) - Females: Mainly obtained their knowledge from family or fiends advises

(3) Desired content of further educational materials - Males: Erectile dysfunction was a prominent topic among all of them - Females: Prevention of yeast infection and menopause

Conclusion

Analysis through the TExT-MED shows that low-income Latino patients will accept text messages as a behavioral intervention. This mHealth intervention acts as a behavioral trigger rather than an education platform. Although the sample size in this study is low, we shouldn't consider it a failure. The work conducted in the study by Burner et al. shows that indeed perzonalization would be a task required in mHealth if further improvement of self-management of diabetes and chronic diseases wants to observed.

Comments

Proper education and management of chronic diseases such as diabetes is important to improve quality of life. The search for innovative, accessible and cost effective tools is essential for patients of all ethnic groups. mHealth is a technology that will benefit many patients.

References

  1. Burner, E., Menchine, M., Taylor, E., & Arora, S. (2013). Gender differences in diabetes self-management: a mixed-methods analysis of a mobile health intervention for inner-city Latino patients. Journal of diabetes science and technology, 7(1), 111-118. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3692222/